Deep Understanding of Garbage Collection: Principles, Algorithms, and Optimization Strategies

1. Preface

Garbage Collection (GC) is an important feature of automatic memory management in modern programming languages. It helps programmers avoid the tedious work of memory management, reducing issues such as memory leaks and dangling pointers. This article will provide a detailed introduction to common GC practices, including the concept of GC, terminology, working principles, advantages and disadvantages, and methods of improvement.

2. The Concept of GC (Garbage Collection)

GC, or Garbage Collection, is a form of automatic memory management. Its primary purpose is to automatically reclaim memory space that is no longer used by the program, avoiding memory leaks and other memory-related issues. The presence of GC means that programmers do not need to manually manage memory allocation and release, thus reducing the risk of memory errors and security vulnerabilities.

3. Basic Terminology Related to GC

1. Object: A dynamically allocated data structure in memory, usually instantiated from classes or structs in the program.

2. Pointer: A variable that points to an object or a specific area of memory.

3. Live Object: An object that still has references in the program, i.e., an object that may still be used by the program’s execution logic.

4. Dead Object: An object that no longer has references in the program, i.e., an object that will no longer be used by the program.

5. Heap: The area where dynamic memory allocation occurs, with objects typically allocated on the heap.

6. Root: Objects that are directly accessible in the program, such as global variables, local variables, and values in CPU registers. GC starts searching for live objects from these roots.

7. Reachability Analysis: GC checks which objects are reachable, i.e., which objects are live, by traversing all possible paths starting from the root set.

8. Mark: GC marks an object when it determines the object is live.

9. Sweep: GC removes unmarked objects and reclaims the memory space they occupy.

10. Compaction: After dead objects are cleared, GC moves live objects to a contiguous memory area to reduce memory fragmentation.

11. Generational: A GC strategy that divides objects according to their lifespan into different generations (such as young generation, old generation) to optimize GC performance.

12. Write Barrier: A runtime check mechanism used to notify GC when an object’s reference is updated, maintaining the correctness of GC.

13. Stop-and-Copy: A GC technique that stops program execution, copies all live objects to a new memory area, and then releases the original memory area.

14. Incremental GC: GC is executed in multiple small steps, cleaning up a portion of garbage each time to reduce program pause time.

15. Concurrent GC: GC is executed concurrently with the running application, minimizing interference with program execution.

4. The Workflow of GC

The workflow of GC typically includes the following steps:

1. Root Enumeration: GC identifies all root objects.

2. Reachability Analysis: Starting from the root objects, GC traverses all references and marks all reachable (live) objects.

3. Mark: Active objects discovered during reachability analysis are marked.

4. Sweep/Compaction: Unmarked objects are cleared, or live objects are compacted to one end of the memory.

5. Update References: If compaction has occurred, all references to moved objects are updated.

6. Resume Execution: After GC is completed, the program continues execution.

5. Challenges of GC

Although GC greatly simplifies memory management, it also brings some challenges:

• Pause Time: GC may need to pause the program during execution, which can affect the program’s response time.
• Throughput: The execution of GC can consume CPU resources, affecting the overall performance of the program.
• Memory Overhead: Additional memory space may be needed to support GC, such as for maintaining information like mark bits and reference relationships.
• Real-time: For systems that require real-time responses, the unpredictability of GC can be a problem.

6. Common GC Algorithms

6.1. Mark-Sweep GC

Working Principle:
The Mark-Sweep GC algorithm is divided into two phases: the marking phase and the sweeping phase. During the marking phase, GC traverses all reachable objects and marks them; during the sweeping phase, GC traverses all objects in the heap and reclaims unmarked objects.

Advantages:

• Relatively simple to implement.
• Does not move objects, suitable for conservative GC.

Disadvantages:

• Can produce memory fragmentation.
• Slow allocation speed due to the need to traverse the free list.

Improvement Methods:

• Use multiple free lists to improve allocation speed.
• BiBOP (Big Bag Of Pages): Manage similarly sized objects in fixed-size blocks.

6.2. Reference Counting

Working Principle:
Each object maintains a reference counter that records how many other objects reference it. When the reference counter drops to zero, the object can be reclaimed.

Advantages:

• Can immediately reclaim garbage.
• Short maximum pause time.

Disadvantages:

• Overhead of incrementing and decrementing counters.
• Counters require additional memory space.
• Cannot handle cyclic references.

Improvement Methods:

• Deferred Reference Counting: Use a Zero Count Table to delay reclamation.
• Sticky Reference Counting: Reduce the number of counter bits.

6.3. Copying GC

Working Principle:
The heap is divided into two halves, with only one half being used at a time. When one half is full, live objects are copied to the other half, and then the current half is cleared.

Advantages:

• High throughput.
• Fast memory allocation.
• No memory fragmentation.

Disadvantages:

• Only half of the heap is usable.
• Not suitable for conservative GC.

Improvement Methods:

• Cheney’s Algorithm: Use breadth-first search instead of depth-first search.
• Multi-space Copying: Combine with Mark-Sweep GC to improve heap utilization.

6.4. Generational Garbage Collection

Working Principle:
The heap is divided into several generations based on the lifespan of objects, typically a young generation and an old generation. The young generation undergoes frequent GC, while the old generation has a lower frequency of GC.

Advantages:

• Improves GC efficiency, as most objects are short-lived.

Disadvantages:

• For long-lived objects, it may lead to frequent promotions and GC.

Improvement Methods:

• Multi-generational Garbage Collection: Add more generations to further improve efficiency.

6.5. Incremental Garbage Collection

Working Principle:
By performing GC operations in steps, alternating between GC and application code execution, the maximum pause time of the application is reduced.

Advantages:

• Reduces the maximum pause time of the application.

Disadvantages:

• Requires the use of write barriers, adding extra runtime overhead.

Improvement Methods:

• Use Steele’s write barriers and deletion barriers to reduce false marking.

6.6. Other GC Algorithms

Here are some other GC algorithms:

1. Improvements to Reference Counting:

   • Detection and Reclamation of Cyclic References: Improved reference counting methods include mechanisms to detect and handle cyclic references, such as using weak references or periodically running an algorithm to detect cycles.

2. Concurrent Mark-Sweep (CMS):

   • CMS is a concurrent GC algorithm that allows garbage collection threads to concurrently execute the marking and sweeping phases while the application is running, reducing application pause times.

3. Garbage-First Collector (G1):

   • G1 is a server-side garbage collector that divides the heap into multiple regions and performs incremental garbage collection based on the priority of garbage collection in each region.

4. Z Garbage Collector (ZGC) and Shenandoah:

   • These two GC algorithms are designed to further reduce pause times. They use advanced techniques such as read-write barriers and concurrent threads to achieve low-pause-time garbage collection.

5. Regional Garbage Collection:

   • Similar to G1, regional garbage collection divides the heap into multiple regions and can independently reclaim each region, allowing for more fine-grained memory management.

6. Real-time Garbage Collection:

   • Real-time garbage collectors aim to provide predictable pause times to meet the needs of real-time systems. They typically use special algorithms to ensure that GC operations do not cause long pauses.

7. Epsilon Garbage Collector (Epsilon GC):

   • This is a “no-op” garbage collector that essentially does not perform any garbage collection operations. It is mainly used for performance testing to measure the performance of applications without GC intervention.

8. Memory Pools and Object Pools:

   • In some cases, to optimize performance, developers may use memory pools or object pools to manage memory, which pre-allocate and reuse fixed-size memory blocks or object instances.

9. Manual Memory Management:

   • In some low-level languages or performance-critical applications, programmers may choose to manually manage memory, completely bypassing the GC mechanism.

7. Developing any platform from Scratch with Codia AI Code

To integrate Codia AI into your Figma to any platform such as frontend, mobile, and Mac development process, follow these instructions:
Open the link: Codia AI Figma to code: HTML, CSS, React, Vue, iOS, Android, Flutter, ReactNative, Tailwind, Web, App

• Install the Codia AI Plugin: Search for and install the Codia AI Figma to Flutter plugin from the Figma plugin store.
• Prepare Your Figma Design: Arrange your Figma design with clearly named layers and components to ensure the best code generation results.
• Convert with Codia AI: Select your design or component in Figma and use Codia AI to instantly

generate any platform code.